Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Sigma DP1 review
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan)
Date: Tue May 20 11:43:45 2008
References: <1B7ECEC5-F79F-4D80-9DE8-6899E0192922@frozenlight.eu> <-2709344426045977982@unknownmsgid> <440b792d0805192257r292ddc59vfbec3eba23aa5984@mail.gmail.com>

Well, the whole reason why many people got excited about the DP1 was  
that it had a sensor similar to 4/3, i.e. much bigger than the  
typical P&S camera has. Therefore, one had the right to expect that  
it would perform on a level similar to the 4/3 cameras or the 1.6  
sensor DSLRs, which clearly is not the case. And when is slow nice?  
Certainly not when trying to do street photography, or any other  
photography for that matter. When I had the GRD, one of the most  
unbearable things about it was that it took 5-6 seconds to write a  
RAW file to the card. From the review, it seems that the Sigma is  
even worse in that regards.

Forget it.

Nathan

On 20-mei-2008, at 7:57, mehrdad wrote:

> Didier, this camera  is still more advanced than the R-d1! it is not a
> 5fps camera but it is quite nice. it is slow but sometimes slow is
> nice. raw or jpeg? always raw!! not good in low light, which camera in
> this class is? see if u can test drive one.
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Didier Ludwig  
> <leica@screengang.com> wrote:
>>
>> The DP1 review is utterly devastating. It seems the Sigma suffers  
>> from the same diseases like the GR-D, but at double cost. What I  
>> am concerned, I have given up the idea to buy one of these - and  
>> the compact camera I discovered is the recently announced http:// 
>> tinyurl.com/3n6vhg Ricoh G600. Small Sensor, no viewfinder - but  
>> water- and shock resistant, that's what I need for bike trails.
>> Didier
>>
>>> I certainly won't be handing over any money for the DP1. Having read
>>> the review--useless in low light (that really is a disappointment,
>>> since I thought that this was the whole point of the larger sensor),
>>> slow AF, extremely slow write speed--sounds like all the reasons why
>>> I got rid of my Ricoh GRD.
>>> Nathan
>>
>>
>>
>>>> It's just too wide.  If they made it a 40mm equivalent or...  
>>>> GASP! a
>>>> 50mm equivalent, I'd be interested.  Until then, I'll stick with  
>>>> what I
>>>> use now and not bat an eye towards the DP1 as I'm sure many
>>>> photographers won't do as well.
>>>> PhilFo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
>  -------------------------------------
>  regards, mehrdad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/128276
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog




Replies: Reply from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] OT: Sigma DP1 review)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] OT: Sigma DP1 review)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT: Sigma DP1 review)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan) ([Leica] OT: Sigma DP1 review)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] OT: Sigma DP1 review)