Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]here is one read and some pics http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1027&message=27955808 On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:57 PM, mehrdad <msadat@gmail.com> wrote: > Didier, this camera is still more advanced than the R-d1! it is not a > 5fps camera but it is quite nice. it is slow but sometimes slow is > nice. raw or jpeg? always raw!! not good in low light, which camera in > this class is? see if u can test drive one. > > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Didier Ludwig <leica@screengang.com> > wrote: >> >> The DP1 review is utterly devastating. It seems the Sigma suffers from >> the same diseases like the GR-D, but at double cost. What I am concerned, >> I have given up the idea to buy one of these - and the compact camera I >> discovered is the recently announced http://tinyurl.com/3n6vhg Ricoh >> G600. Small Sensor, no viewfinder - but water- and shock resistant, >> that's what I need for bike trails. >> Didier >> >>> I certainly won't be handing over any money for the DP1. Having read >>> the review--useless in low light (that really is a disappointment, >>> since I thought that this was the whole point of the larger sensor), >>> slow AF, extremely slow write speed--sounds like all the reasons why >>> I got rid of my Ricoh GRD. >>> Nathan >> >> >> >>>> It's just too wide. If they made it a 40mm equivalent or... GASP! a >>>> 50mm equivalent, I'd be interested. Until then, I'll stick with what I >>>> use now and not bat an eye towards the DP1 as I'm sure many >>>> photographers won't do as well. >>>> PhilFo >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad