Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Fri Apr 25 07:48:51 2008
References: <011a01c8a682$1f177750$6101a8c0@jimnichols> <297BFC7F-1E47-4ABF-80B0-A68D8E3CBF06@comcast.net> <012901c8a685$5053ceb0$6101a8c0@jimnichols> <CD96C12F-F279-4567-B197-443CCA414CA1@comcast.net> <4811C8D8.7020308@gmx.de>

Hi Douglas,

The Leica-R to Canon adapters from Novoflex are much superior to the  
Fotodiox Pro version. I have both and must use the Novoflex with  
larger lenses. The Novoflex is heavy spring loaded to keep the lens  
tight to the camera body. All other adapters just slit and spread  
soft metal strips to keep the lens tight, which it doesn't. I have  
had lenses fall off the camera with the cheaper adapters. That  
doesn't happen with the Novoflex. The focus confirmation adapters use  
the same mounts with the chip pcb glued in. I got fed up with the  
poor quality adapters and now installed split image screens for my  
Canon EOS 1Ds Mk II body. I also find the focus is more accurate. i  
don't know what Novoflex is selling where you are but it can't be the  
same adapter that B&H gets $255 for. I use the Leica 560mm Telyt and  
280mm f2.8 APO Telyt-R. Only the Novoflex can handle it.

Regards,
Len


On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Douglas Sharp wrote:

> Just been looking at the Fotodiox adapters - the Pro Grade ones  
> seem to be from Kindai - very close to the quality of Novoflex (if  
> not better) - must be good they're marketed by Novoflex over here.  
> The Fotodiax Leica and CO/Y adapters are sold over here by  
> enjoyyourcamera.com - these are also excellent quality and are also  
> available with  focus confirmation chips for around 80 Euros (they  
> are built in China). What's disappointing is the quality of the  
> Rollei QBM to EOS adapter (for those lovely Zeiss lenses) The  
> construction is rather rough and the tab to depress the diaphragm  
> pin easily breaks off - this one is also marketed in Europe by  
> enjoyyourcamera.
> Cheers
> Douglas
>
> Leonard Taupier wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Hi have been using Fotodiox for my adapters (without chips). They  
>> have been reliable. I believe most of the adapters sold are the  
>> same except for the very expensive Leica and Novoflex (which are  
>> better made for 10X the price).
>>
>> Look here.
>>
>> <http://www.fotodiox.com/shop/product_info.php? 
>> cPath=27&products_id=4138>
>>
>> It looks like any 4/3 adapter is $27.95 from them.
>>
>> Len
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Len.  I just posted a note on the Oly PN forum to see if  
>>> anyone has found an outstanding adapter source.  There are a lot  
>>> of them out there, and the descriptions all sound the same.
>>>
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leonard Taupier"  
>>> <len-1@comcast.net>
>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:24 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> The birds are beautiful. I like the colors. Time to get that  
>>>> adapter  for your Pentax 200mm though. You shouldn't need one  
>>>> with a chip.
>>>>
>>>> Len
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:11 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am still restricted to my normal zoom lens, effectively 108mm  
>>>>> on  a normal 35mm frame, but couldn't pass up the opportunity  
>>>>> to get  some images of the colorful migrants.  These Rose- 
>>>>> Breasted  Grosbeaks come by our feeders each Spring and Fall  
>>>>> and compete with  the finches and cardinals that normally  
>>>>> dominate our feeders,  filled with black-oil sunflower seeds.
>>>>>
>>>>> These images are cropped severely, but the colors are as close  
>>>>> to  real life as I could make them.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Grosbeak51.jpg.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Grosbeak59.jpg.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Grosbeak61.jpg.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments and critique welcomed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Nichols
>>>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Grosbeaks)