Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]my 135 elmarit pictures on the leica gallery were with the 135 head plus the short mount then the R adapter then the EOS adapter on the 30D. -rei On Jan25 10:32, Dennis Kushner wrote: > Another alternative is to use the 135 lens head with a 16462 focusing > mount > & 14167 R adapter with R/EOS adapter to salvage some use out of usually > mint > glass. Of course you could buy the R 135/2.8 lens for way less but that > would > be too easy to find. BTW, makes a 270mm on E-330. > > Dennis > > > On Jan 23, 2008, at 6:12 AM, Buzz Hausner wrote: > > >Upon reflection I have decided that you guys are actually right. The > >135 > >f/2.8 was the finest lens ever marketed by Leica and it sets the > >standard > >for all rangefinder lenses. Based on your comments, I have come to the > >conclusion that the 135 Tele Elmarit...with eyes...represents the > >pinnacle > >of optical design achievement and EVERYNE should rush out and buy one. > >Right now. > > > >There, is that better? > > > >Buzz > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey