Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Luis, Maybe you are right. At the moment it is a defective lens. But I enjoy using it just to see how the photos come out. Maybe I'll keep it as is. Thanks for your thoughtful comments. Best Regards, Len On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Len, > > I realize that I like very much the atmosphere with the old lenses, > maybe > our common friend Hoppy is right, I like the results with "deffective > lenses", the atmosphere is someting special. IMHO, if this lens was > mine I > would keep as it is, you already have modern lenses for perfect > performances. > > Saludos cordiales > Luis > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En > nombre de > Leonard Taupier > Enviado el: lunes, 07 de enero de 2008 22:18 > Para: Leica Users Group > Asunto: [Leica] Img: Uncoated Summar IR photo > > Since the question regarding an uncoated Summar came up and I was > playing > with IR, I decided to combine the two. > > First off my Summar isn't that great. It has a little haze which I'm > planning to get cleaned up one of these days but the glass is free of > cleaning marks. No coating to scratch I guess. > > I'm pretty surprised that it does OK for IR. It's a pretty low > contrast > lens. > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/Infra_Red/ > Summar_IR_2a.jpg.html> > > or > > http://tinyurl.com/2589oj > > Let me know what you think. > > Len > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information