[Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work)

[philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)]

> Next I'll be accused of dirty stuff.

Walt, you are so right.
With all the fuzz about SEX this was becoming a very frivolous  
discussion. So very fin de si?cle.
Meanwhile, we're almost 8 years already into the new millenium.
For how long will we have to suffer this 20th century puritanism?
No, the turn you gave this interpretation battle is so much more  
interesting.

About photography, I think a photo can never be real. It can only  
give an impression of reality.
Impression leads to interpretation. Interpretation to discussion.  
Which makes this all so interesting.

Philippe

>
> Lottermoser George wrote:
>> I like it. Rings true - this slicing of reality into little fake  
>> pieces (i think hole mixes metaphors ;~)
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george@imagist.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> Or is it slice the reality into little fake holes?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>