Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Fri Sep 28 20:32:26 2007
References: <46FCE979.4030802@waltjohnson.com><212573.39604.qm@web52904.mail.re2.yahoo.com><001801c80226$6feee880$6401a8c0@asus930> <46FDB6B6.4070205@san.rr.com>

Thanks Jerry. That one has more hits than almost anything in my galleries 
for some reason. Also a rarity that my wife consented to
posing for it, albeit briefly. "Please look up while you walk in your 
garden". I guess more separation from the subject is less of
an imposition for the camera shy, too. Not great processing by me for the BW 
but I'm getting more refined there. I might repost it
de-spotted some. 
Now I'm bidding on one of the APO-Telyts here in Aus. Like I need another 
135... I don't have any experience with the f2.8.

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?

Hoppy,

Really great tightly framed portrait!   I have alway been an enthusiast 
for the 135mm  length lens, having use it on my Leicas for
sports car racing  shots, as well as for babies or pets where it would 
be intimidating to be too close.

The latest LHSA magazine touts the virtue of the f2.8 135mm Elmarit with 
"eyes", but says that hey are "a hot commodity,
but try finding one"  I dinna know they were rare or expensive.  Are they?

Jerry


G Hopkinson wrote:
> Bernardo, optically the same and barely behind the legendary APO-Telyt 
> 135. A bargain if you have a need for the 135. I have this
> one (the Tele) and also the earlier Elmar which does still does really 
> well but is a little behind in contrast, I think. Buy the
> Tele, take a couple of steps back and make some wonderful tightly framed 
> portraits. 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/F2/portrait.jpg.html>
> Really easy to use on the M3 with its higher magnification viewfinder too. 
>
> Cheers
> Hoppy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?
>
> Hello
>    
>   Is there any optical difference between versions of the tele elmar 135mm?
>    
>   Thanks!
>
>    
>   


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?)
In reply to: Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG: Barack Obama)
Message from bernardofeio at yahoo.com.br (bernardo feio) ([Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] optical difference between the tele elmar 135mm?)