Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, IMO we should compare not the same image scanned with a high quality scanner, we should compare with a chemical print on baryta paper on a classical darkromm. I've not yet see any digital print better than a Baryta one. Well, I'm talking only about B&W, on colour I'm not sure. Saludos cordiales Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de Lottermoser George Enviado el: viernes, 31 de agosto de 2007 16:10 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica answer You have been hearing from M8 users who have compared the results of both M8 files and M6/film files (scanned on top quality scanners at 4000lpi) with the same lenses; ever since the M8 arrived on the scene. I feel fairly safe in saying that Ted, Tina, Steve, et al have scanned film from M2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and have chosen the M8 over those for: Quality of image file and convenience of image handling. Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > What I would like to see is a comparison of the M8 with a film Leica, > say the M6, using the same lenses on each, the film to be scanned at > 4000 lpi on a top quality scanner. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information