Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Aug 31, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Lottermoser George wrote: > You have been hearing from M8 users who have compared the results > of both M8 files and M6/film files (scanned on top quality scanners > at 4000lpi) with the same lenses; ever since the M8 arrived on the > scene. I feel fairly safe in saying that Ted, Tina, Steve, et al > have scanned film from M2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and have chosen the M8 > over those for: Quality of image file and convenience of image > handling. that would be correct George... the only question is... what are we taking pictures with ? (and you know the answer) > If it's not in my hands taking photos, it's far more expensive and > far less useful... It makes what I'm using seem cheap by comparison, and cheap compared to the lenses I'm putting on it, Steve > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george@imagist.com > > > > On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > >> What I would like to see is a comparison of the M8 with a film >> Leica, say the M6, using the same lenses on each, the film to be >> scanned at 4000 lpi on a top quality scanner. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information