Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I wrote: >I just could not believe these petunias. Even in the shade, they seemed >to be florescent. <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1001127UVPetunias.jpg.html> My printer couldn't believe the colors, either. I just tried to print the above picture, and the colors came out very different from the screen. Instead of the florescent magenta-purple, I get very red flowers. Red like a Poinsettia at Christmas. The only place a few petals look purple is on the very left, at the top right, where the flowers are a little faded or shaded. But not jaded. Have I encountered the dreaded out of gamut conundrum? Did the ghost of Dr. Fourrier, immortalized in my print driver, take a look at the RGB numbers and refuse to transform? "No way," he'd say. I'd overflow my register. I'd divide by zero and disappear into a Black Hole. And my cat would die!" I had the same results on two different printers, an R200 and an R1800. The R1800 did a little better, but had basically the same problem. I printed from a 16-bit TIFF. I generally use sRGB color space for workflow simplicity. Might I have a better chance of getting the colors right if I used Adobe RGB? Or if I tweaked the rendering intent? Or are the printers just not capable of reproducing this color? Is this a case of The Effect of Out of Gamut Rays On Man-In-The-Moon Purple Petunias? Seriously, this is not a huge deal, but I'm curious what to do about it. This is only the second time I've encountered a color that totally weirded out my printer. --Peter