Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 bad pixel question?
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Tue Jul 10 06:22:42 2007
References: <82c9dd70707070445t450b2d01t1661f8c23784fa9d@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0707070541o1647648dwd3f3d4fa6e5f9344@mail.gmail.com> <82c9dd70707100546x2b75e68fqfd5f488479a2bb1d@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189160707100559j1e9190f8w5c629a35ceea1dc6@mail.gmail.com>

laughing.. took a minute to get the pirate reference.

Thar be a great evil white pixel lurking below.

Thar she blows (blown?)


On 7/10/07, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/10/07, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for calming me down. I have emailed Leica.
> > I am sure they will say "send it in"
> >
> > I think it IS one blown pixel that the software is correcting.
> > You can just barely see it in final 100% blowups in the shadows.
> > I mean we are talking NO real world impact -- but a blown pixel is a
> blown
> > pixel.
> > And $4995 is well.. a lot of money.
> >
> > ARGH..
> > Eric
> >
> >
> Just think, 999,999 great pixels are left !
>
> Are you a pirate?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] M8 bad pixel question?)