Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Tue May 8 16:58:24 2007
References: <000301c7901b$5d5de5e0$619acc48@GATEWAY><2CC34D05-E7D7-4825-A7F5-C2095D3AD14C@charter.net><006401c790e6$da63f450$2101a8c0@luispersonal><E92E52EF-674B-4A1F-A160-7A48D9484241@charter.net><009001c790f8$8ff78140$2101a8c0@luispersonal><5837CC56-0596-4DB7-A0C2-C55C5BCA030D@charter.net><002d01c7919c$5779bc30$2101a8c0@luispersonal><9A521993-858D-49CA-B8C1-87CDBA8E225C@charter.net><004e01c791c0$01e45cc0$2101a8c0@luispersonal> <416ED312-C7A3-4FAA-A70D-4D8CCD86ECFF@charter.net>

Sorry, I'm not sure to understand your question, if you ask if they push the
development for me, the answer is no, is their regular development

Saludos
Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
Slobodan Dimitrov
Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 09 de mayo de 2007 0:48
Para: Leica Users Group
Asunto: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan

Will they pull development for you?

Slobodan Dimitrov




On May 8, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:

> That's worlwide accepted, obviously at this step that's not the 
> question for me. The development of my films is by a professional Lab 
> I'm very satisfied, maybe the exposure of the showed shot was not the 
> idoneous, but at least on my experience after photographing up when I 
> was 13 I only have obtained this kind of results very few times when 
> I've used old lenses, and I insist on my opinion that this will be not 
> the result with i.e. my Summicron #11819, I'm sure that editing could 
> be improved, or should be. The new Elmar-M is a nice lens, I enjoy it, 
> but IMO on these extremely backlighting conditions shows a weak point.
> Saludos,
> Luis
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En 
> nombre de Slobodan Dimitrov Enviado el: martes, 08 de mayo de 2007 
> 23:21
> Para: Leica Users Group
> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan
>
> It's a way to figure out the optimal parameter between exposure and 
> development.
> While originally intended for 4x5, it can be adapted for 120 and 35mm.
> I looked for it on the net, and came up blank. I did find the Fred 
> Picker material, but that doesn't address roll film.
> This was a staple of photo 100 classes. Unfortunately processing is 
> rarely thought at schools these days.
> One has to know the materials. If not, then that gap in one's 
> knowledge is a limitation that becomes the plateau of one's 
> capabilities.
>
> Slobodan Dimitrov
>
>
>
>
> On May 8, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Luis Ripoll wrote:
>
>> Hi Slobodan,
>>
>> What do you mind for a "9 negative test"?
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Luis
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En 
>> nombre de slobodan dimitrov Enviado el: martes, 08 de mayo de 2007
>> 3:37
>> Para: Leica Users Group
>> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan
>>
>> Actually, it's not the lens performance that is in question so much 
>> as the performance of the photographer.
>> The issue in this image is that of exposure and processing.
>> Luis, tell me, have you ever done a 9 negative test?
>>
>> S. Dimitrov
>>
>>
>> On May 7, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Slobodan,
>>>
>>> Not at all, exceot if you want... it will be welcome as always, my 
>>> own critique is on the lens performance, I don't like very much this 
>>> picture, IMO the results of this strong backlight situation reminds 
>>> me the results I had with other older lenses, i.e. I think that 
>>> actual Summicron will performs better on such situation.
>>>
>>> Saludos cordiales
>>> Luis
>>>
>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En 
>>> nombre de Slobodan Dimitrov Enviado el: martes, 08 de mayo de 2007
>>> 0:33
>>> Para: Leica Users Group
>>> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan
>>>
>>> Are you asking for a critique?
>>>
>>> Slobodan Dimitrov
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 7, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Slobodan,
>>>>
>>>> I had a hard work editing this picture with the new Elmar-M, of 
>>>> course it is a very strong light situation, and I'm sure that it 
>>>> would be very difficult to manage with any other lens, but on a 
>>>> such crazy test...
>>>>
>>>>  http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3023665
>>>>
>>>> Saludos cordiales
>>>> Luis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>>> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
>>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En 
>>>> nombre de slobodan dimitrov Enviado el: domingo, 06 de mayo de 2007
>>>> 23:44
>>>> Para: Leica Users Group
>>>> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 
>>>> Summaron
>>>> - NowSummitar
>>>>
>>>> I have a LTM Summitar from the early 1950's. While of a slightly 
>>>> lower contrast, what it gains in flare makes it virtually useless 
>>>> near the ocean.
>>>> out here.
>>>> Now the new Elmar-M, that's a different story. Less prone to flare, 
>>>> if at all, and smooth consistent luminosity under the worst 
>>>> possible light condition.
>>>>
>>>> S. Dimitrov
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 6, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I mean pancake flat, like an Elmar. Daniel want to put it in his 
>>>>> trouser pocket.
>>>>>
>>>>> But now that you mention it, last week a guest speaker at the LHSA 
>>>>> spring shoot mentioned some excellent low contrast Leica lenses, 
>>>>> but I failed to write it down. Like you, I get terrible contrast 
>>>>> problems in the subtropical sun down here. The lens he mentioned 
>>>>> was probably single-coated, post-WWII.
>>>>> It wasn't the Summarit or the Summaron (I have both of those). My 
>>>>> recollection (fuzzy) was that it was a Summitar. Anyone out there 
>>>>> use one of those these days?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeffery Smith
>>>>> New Orleans, LA
>>>>> http://www.400tx.com
>>>>> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>>>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf 
>>>>> Of slobodan dimitrov
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 2:07 PM
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 
>>>>> Summaron
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my lighting environment, the harbors of LA and LB, their
>>>>> contrast suits me just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> S. Dimitrov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I started one re: people's thoughts on 35mm LTM lenses, but
>>>>>> I didn't care if they were FLAT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeffery Smith
>>>>>> New Orleans, LA
>>>>>> http://www.400tx.com
>>>>>> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>>>>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf
>>>>>> Of Daniel Ridings
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 3:16 AM
>>>>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5
>>>>>> Summaron
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it my brain or did we have a 35mm LTM thread last week or the
>>>>>>> week before Remember how I mentioned my Summaron? Others
>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>> others?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am sorry to have missed it. I have had to pass over  
>>>>>> hundreds, if
>>>>>> not a couple thousand, postings lately. I just haven't been
>>>>>> able to
>>>>>> keep up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the tip. I'll check out the archives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>>> information
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - Now Summitar)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - Now Summitar)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and... To Slobodan)