Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i'm not bashing the m8 at all, actually i would quite like to have one but i need it to work in a client situation. i just shot about 30 executive portraits the last 2 days (with a d200): if say, i had used the m8 for my shoot and this "bug" had reared it's head 30 times (actually 30 times, 4 versions of each person totaling 120 times) i'd a been one unhappy dude. as much as i would like to get an m8, at this point in my life, i would need to be able to depend on it professionally and it still seems buggy to me. which kinda makes me a little sad. leo On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Harrison McClary wrote: > Sonny Carter wrote: >> >>> >> Oh, I was taking his word for it. I couldn't see the divide in Hugh's >> pictures even on my calibrated monitors at work. > > I could not see it in Hugh's photo either. >> >> Geez, makes you wonder how the world sees our work on line, huh? >> >> Anyhow, I stand by my first suggestion. Stop testing, and take >> pictures of >> that lovely girl. >> >> Or if you have to test, please do it all on her. Pretty eyes, >> pretty smile >> > > I don't know...Some of those cheerleaders you used to shoot would > work fine for test subjects also. :) > > > -- > Harrison McClary > Harrison McClary Photography > harrison@mcclary.net > http://www.mcclary.net > ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography > http://www.imagestocksouth.com > Tobacco Road: Personal Blog: > http://www.mcclary.net/blog > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information