Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Lightroom scans to WEB
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Sun Mar 25 07:12:48 2007
References: <60741.213.64.79.163.1174812031.squirrel@www.dlridings.se> <46063AE3.5090901@wanadoo.nl> <46063D81.8040106@dlridings.se>

Hi Daniel,

I do agree that ligthroom is much better wit digital files than scans.
Also the sharpening is very limited.
But the workflow is very fast.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema

Daniel Ridings wrote:
> Hi Michiel,
> 
> Yes, sharpening is probably needed. But that means:
> 
> 1) Dumping Lightroom
> 2) Just using Photoshop
> 
> Lightroom, like Lightzone, only sharpens fullsized images. It doesn't 
> make any sense to even try to sharpen an image the size of 5600 x 3600 
> pixels and then, after sharpening, resize it to 600 x 400 or something 
> similar.
> 
> When I work against RAW files I export the files as tiffs (you get a 
> chance to resize them when you export them), and then I take them into 
> Gimp or Photoshop and add sharpening.
> 
> With scans, you'd almost want to stick with Photoshop or Gimp the whole 
> way. Cloning and healing in Lightroom is designed for the odd spot, not 
> for a Nikon LS-5000 scan that catches all of the blemishes.
> 
> There is no way to scroll around on the full-sized image. In Photoshop 
> you can click on the slider part of a window and scroll one window at 
> time and work your way through the image.
> 
> With Lightroom you have to drag the little square around, making sure 
> you overlap a little since you aren't getting exact scrolls from one 
> section to another ... it is ... a ... drag.
> 
> My conclusion is pretty much that if you scan film, then Lightroom is in 
> the way more than it is of help.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> Michiel Fokkema wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> The whites look a bit washed out. I'm also watching on a laptop but 
>> mine is calibrated. I think the pictures are also a bit too small. Try 
>> the sharpening.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michiel Fokkema
>>
>> dlr@dlridings.se wrote:
>>> Well, Nathan said it could be done ...
>>>
>>> So I've tried Lightroom with RAW files, but how would it work to use it
>>> for my scans.
>>>
>>> I took a roll yesterday (IIIf, 50 Elmar, Fortepan 400, Calbe 49 
>>> (Atomal)).
>>>
>>> I scanned it this morning and moved the raw scans (around 40 mb each) 
>>> over
>>> to a little disk that I then connected to my laptop.
>>>
>>> Instead of "exporting" I chose "upload" and Lightroom uploaded (by 
>>> ftp) to
>>> my server instead of exporting the whole set to a local drive 
>>> (whereupon I
>>> would need to upload with FTP).
>>>
>>> http://www.dlridings.se/lightroom/2007v12/
>>>
>>> Quick, unjustified crticisms : spotting (cloning and healing) is there,
>>> but you'd rather do it in Photoshop.
>>>
>>> I haven't sharpened them (do they look ok?)
>>>
>>> I am using a laptop whose screen I am not used to (not calibrated). I've
>>> just done things by working against the histogram.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 


Replies: Reply from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: Lightroom scans to WEB)
In reply to: Message from dlr at dlridings.se (dlr@dlridings.se) ([Leica] IMG: Lightroom scans to WEB)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] IMG: Lightroom scans to WEB)
Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: Lightroom scans to WEB)