Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Question: I have never used a BW chromogenic film. I've done all my B&W photography with silver based films developed in the traditional way. But in the last couple of years I've abandoned my wet darkroom because of skin allergies to chemicals. I have been scanning all my color negatives to create a data base, using a Minolta Dimage 5400 scanner. Apart from taking a long time, the ICE facility is marvelous for eliminating all those nuisance dust spots. My specific question is - if I standardize on a readily available color negative film, say ASA 100 or 200 Kodak Royal Gold, scan the negative, then turn it into a grayscale in PS, will the results be comparable to a B&W chromogenic film. The Kodak web site seems to indicate that if you want prints, then silver based B&W films are preferable. Their reasoning seems to be that the dyes and base color of BW400CN makes printing difficult. But if I want to use an ink jet or laser printer, does it matter? Larry Z