Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Paying to shoot
From: nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts)
Date: Sun Jul 16 14:49:51 2006

I feel very uneasy being in any way critical of Ted - he's a hero of mine - 
but in this case, we're not talking press work but stock, surely? And surely 
it's reasonable for different rules to apply?
 
Nick

----- Original Message ----
From: Roy Feldman <roy@detroitphotographic.com>
To: lug@leica-users.org
Sent: Sunday, 16 July, 2006 9:26:17 PM
Subject: [Leica] Paying to shoot


In defense of Ted (as if he needs it) who; when one looks up the definition
of photojournalist in the dictionary, his picture is right there.
Item 7 of the National Press Photographers code of ethics:

Do not pay sources or subjects or reward them materially for information or
participation.

When I work for my paper, if I were to ever pay a location fee, I would be
termnated immediately.
FYI: the rest are here:
http://www.nppa.org/professional_development/business_practices/ethics.html
and here:
http://www.nppa.org/professional_development/business_practices/digitalethics.html
-- 
Roy Feldman, photojournalism & editorial photography

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Paying to shoot)
In reply to: Message from roy at detroitphotographic.com (Roy Feldman) ([Leica] Paying to shoot)