Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am with Steve (and you, Tina) on this. This is kind of Anne Geddes kitsch, although with a dark undertone. As for the defenders of her work, someone will always defend all kinds of garbage because it is "original and thought-provoking"; you can even get prizes for putting up an unmade bed in a gallery these days ;-) Nathan Tina Manley wrote: > At 05:13 PM 7/5/2006, you wrote: > It results from a conspiracy between unscrupulous and ambitious >> parents and an unscrupulous and ambitious photographer... >> >> >> the photography is so/so, but in this setting, who cares...? >> >> Steve > > Well, that's my opinion, too, but some of the professional commercial > photographers are defending the work, saying it is thought provoking > and original and that no permanent damage was done to the kids. > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA > http://www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS! General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507 Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog