Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/07/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Wed Jul 5 14:45:22 2006
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060705141614.06cac798@infoave.net> <6F565E55-2116-4ABC-A97F-55784724D5D8@cox.net>
At 05:13 PM 7/5/2006, you wrote:
It results from a conspiracy between unscrupulous and ambitious
>parents and an unscrupulous and ambitious photographer...
>
>
>the photography is so/so, but in this setting, who cares...?
>
>Steve
Well, that's my opinion, too, but some of the professional commercial
photographers are defending the work, saying it is thought provoking
and original and that no permanent damage was done to the kids.
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from enitka1 at comcast.net (Ernest Nitka) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
Reply from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
In reply to:
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)