Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed Jul 5 14:55:46 2006
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060705141614.06cac798@infoave.net> <6F565E55-2116-4ABC-A97F-55784724D5D8@cox.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20060705174347.02484c08@infoave.net>

On Jul 5, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> At 05:13 PM 7/5/2006, you wrote:
> It results from a conspiracy between unscrupulous and ambitious
>> parents and an unscrupulous and ambitious photographer...
>>
>>
>> the photography is so/so, but in this setting, who cares...?
>>
>> Steve
>
> Well, that's my opinion, too, but some of the professional  
> commercial photographers are defending the work, saying it is  
> thought provoking and original and that no permanent damage was  
> done to the kids.


sure, anything to make a buck...stir up controversy to attract notoriety

for the mediocre ... to sell some photos...

the parents should be drawn and quartered,

the photographer only hung.

Steve


>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from pjleeson at mchsi.com (Philip Leeson) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Jill Greenberg's Distressed Children)