Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some square stuff--not Leica, but at least film
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Wed May 10 20:46:24 2006
References: <4F488248ADCD6C419976DFE43A115091EBAC42@sv-ex01.jp2hs.campus>

On 5/11/06, Arche, Harvey <Harvey.Arche@jp2hs.org> wrote:
> Nathan,
> Love the square stuff; don't quit the film!
> I'm curious how you feel about the Foma 200; its working quite well for 
> you. I've been messing some with the 35mm version, which seems to be 
> different (clear base), and not happy with it yet. Are you shooting at 200 
> ISO? Luis (also using the square stuff) recommends going to ISO 160 and 
> prefers it at 100. Anybody else have preferences for this film in 35?

I really like it in 35mm. I like it so much that it has lured me away
from using iso 400 films as my slowest films.

I shoot it at 200 and get all the shadow detail I would every need.
This is more or less a torture test for the film. It passes with
flying colors.

http://www.dlridings.se/paw/2006/11.html

I just process it in D76 1:1 for 8 minutes.

Daniel


Replies: Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Some square stuff--not Leica, but at least film)
In reply to: Message from Harvey.Arche at jp2hs.org (Arche, Harvey) ([Leica] Some square stuff--not Leica, but at least film)