Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Tue Feb 21 15:42:16 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060221155131.02a8a5b0@mail.rhtc.net>
 
Don't tempt him Tina ................... it all depends on how many  
prints one makes ..............

B.

On 21-feb-2006, at 21:52, Tina Manley wrote:

> At 11:43 AM 2/21/2006, you wrote:
>
>> But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've  
>> learned from this thread.
>
> It's a great printer, unless you want to go with the massive 4800.   
> You'll actually save money in ink and paper with the 4800.
>
> Tina
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)