Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue Feb 21 12:54:21 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca4m3f7595a90be96835@mail.gmail.com> <F6FD7FF8180B97E95144140B@hindolveston.reid.org>
At 11:43 AM 2/21/2006, you wrote:
>But I think I should buy an Epson 2400 printer, based on what I've
>learned from this thread.
It's a great printer, unless you want to go with the massive
4800. You'll actually save money in ink and paper with the 4800.
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from jonathan at openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
In reply to:
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)