Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue Feb 21 18:50:14 2006
References: <a2f8f4470602210806o5a62b9bo1af2cecde6a88afe@mail.gmail.com><"NEB BJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEPODNAB.red735i"@earthlink.net><"a2f8f4470602210821n5d385ca 4m3f7595a90be96835"@mail.gmail.com><005301c6370b$61eae5f0$6101a8c0@jimnichols> <43FBC7C9.1020004@eth.net>
Thanks for clearing up the differences in the Epsons. I saw that the 2400
refill numbers were slightly different from the 800/1800 numbers, but did
not realize the difference in the printing approach.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
In reply to:
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)