Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Wed Aug 10 19:30:26 2005
References: <005201c59d7e$21bd6e70$749177d9@siscad.com> <85875628b40b7c422aecaea90871f5c3@singnet.com.sg> <6.2.3.4.2.20050810130723.03fd4738@mail.rhtc.net>

Tina,
I see a 35 F1.4 Canon lens in your future and no M or Noctilux on your
next trip to Honduras.  You can get probably better results at 3200
and 1.4 than 800 at F1 with no film.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com

On 8/10/05, Tina Manley <images@infoave.net> wrote:
> At 12:27 PM 8/10/2005, you wrote:
> But I'm glad for you that you have found the right tool for your
> needs - that's the most important. For my needs, the sample images of
> the DMR so far have seem pretty noisy at ISO 400 and up (and it
> doesn't do 1600?), and for those shooting conditions, I'm finding my
> 20D to be simply amazing and unbeatable for its value!
> >----------
> >David Teo "Red Dawn" Boon Hwee
> 
> This is what really kills the DMR for me.  I've been very impressed
> with the Mark II at 1600 and 3200.  The 1600 looks better than 400
> scanned film and the 3200 is better than 800 scanned film.  I take a
> lot of photos in almost no light.  I've just gotten the Canon 85/1.2
> which looks like it's going to be one of my favorite lenses.
> 
> Tina
> 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)
In reply to: Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (Peter Werner) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)