Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, I see a 35 F1.4 Canon lens in your future and no M or Noctilux on your next trip to Honduras. You can get probably better results at 3200 and 1.4 than 800 at F1 with no film. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 8/10/05, Tina Manley <images@infoave.net> wrote: > At 12:27 PM 8/10/2005, you wrote: > But I'm glad for you that you have found the right tool for your > needs - that's the most important. For my needs, the sample images of > the DMR so far have seem pretty noisy at ISO 400 and up (and it > doesn't do 1600?), and for those shooting conditions, I'm finding my > 20D to be simply amazing and unbeatable for its value! > >---------- > >David Teo "Red Dawn" Boon Hwee > > This is what really kills the DMR for me. I've been very impressed > with the Mark II at 1600 and 3200. The 1600 looks better than 400 > scanned film and the 3200 is better than 800 scanned film. I take a > lot of photos in almost no light. I've just gotten the Canon 85/1.2 > which looks like it's going to be one of my favorite lenses. > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >