Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu Aug 11 06:21:28 2005
References: <005201c59d7e$21bd6e70$749177d9@siscad.com> <85875628b40b7c422aecaea90871f5c3@singnet.com.sg> <6.2.3.4.2.20050810130723.03fd4738@mail.rhtc.net> <9b678e0508101930714b0d0c@mail.gmail.com>

At 10:30 PM 8/10/2005, you wrote:
>Tina,
>I see a 35 F1.4 Canon lens in your future and no M or Noctilux on your
>next trip to Honduras.  You can get probably better results at 3200
>and 1.4 than 800 at F1 with no film.
>
>Don

Don -  I have the 24/1.4 Canon which, with the multiplication factor 
is a 31/1.4.  It's my most used lens.  The last trip to Honduras I 
took the M7 and 35/1.4 and Noctilux.  I shot two rolls of film and 
over 3000 digital photos. ;-)  I haven't developed the film yet. You 
are right.  When I leave for Guatemala in three weeks, I won't be 
taking film.  It's just too much of a hassle to get it through all of 
the airport inspections and to develop it when I get back.  The 
beautiful high ISOs of Canon digitals continue to amaze me.

Tina

Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com 



In reply to: Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (Peter Werner) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Canon Anything vs. DMR)