Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]From looking at your past shots, I'd say you're 1.5 to 2 stops under exposed. If it's a stylistic decision, then never mind. Slobodan Dimitrov Studio G-8, AGCC http://sdimitrovphoto.com On Jun 12, 2005, at 6:27 PM, Feli wrote: > On Jun 12, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Montie Talbert wrote: > >> Feli, assuming your conclusion is based on one scene shot on one >> roll with the same exposure for all three lenses, then you may be >> right about the higher contrast >> fingerprint. I don't own the current cron but I've read the >> contrast is higher. If that's true it would certainly stand to >> reason that, under enlargement, the "appearance of grain" would >> be greater. >> Montie >> > > The light out here in sunny California is very consistent. The vast > majority of my shots > are taken at f16@1/500th on Tri-X (400asa). Soup is always the same. > > I think you are right, it would be interesting to take a sequence > of test frames on the same > roll. I'll give that a try and we'll see what happens. > > feli > > > > > ________________________________________________________ > feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 > www.elanphotos.com > > > no archive > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >