Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Now RAW vs JPEG
From: creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring)
Date: Sat May 21 12:08:44 2005
References: <440b792d05052015422204252b@mail.gmail.com> <cb836686129dd53b8963a649882feb71@earthlink.net> <440b792d05052017264a72ddd0@mail.gmail.com> <002301c55da2$07179bc0$1ae76c18@ted> <9a17f2c2a0371db54690bee9faf43139@earthlink.net> <6.1.2.0.2.20050520230512.01f53550@mail.comporium.net>

Tina, You are absolutely right!
Digital imaging is similar to digital recording. When the first compact
discs players were produced, the sound was horrendous. It took almost 20
years and now audiophiles can almost "live" with compact discs.(Through
superior D/A sampling converters)
In the future we will be able to produce superior images with our "RAW"
files.
Someday, these images may "almost" look as good to us as images we
produced
from film.

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Manley" <images@InfoAve.Net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Now RAW vs JPEG


> At 10:01 PM 5/20/2005, you wrote:
>>Why shoot RAW? It's nothing but a pain in the ass and more work!
>>
>>My routine when handling digital images on the computer? JPEG
>
>
> Sorry to be late but I just caught up with this thread.  No, Ted!!  I'm
> sorry but I very much disagree here.
>
> Would you make a print from a negative and then destroy the negative
> because you had the print?
>
> A JPEG or Tiff is the print equivalent of a digital RAW negative.  You
can
> develop the RAW negative many different ways with the software that is
> available now.  Who knows what will be available in the future!  With a
> RAW file (negative) you will be able to take advantage of any
improvements
> in conversion software just like you can now use old negatives to
continue
> to make better and better prints with the technology that is available.
>
> RAW is always the way to go unless you are just taking snapshots that
you
> never intend to use again.
>
> Tina
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 371 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!



In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] OT: canon 1dsII now has a wireless network transmitter)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] OT: canon 1dsII now has a wireless network transmitter)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] OT: canon 1dsII now has a wireless network transmitter)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] OT: canon 1dsII now has a wireless network transmitter)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] OT: canon 1dsII now has a wireless network transmitter)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Now RAW vs JPEG)