Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd go with the Nikon 35Ti. ;-) Gene -----Original Message----- From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:54:54 -0700 Subject: Re: [Leica] CL vs. CLE If an M6/7 with a cron 35 is too much too haul around, get a Contax T3... Steve Jeffery Smith wrote: > If you want a 40/2.4 put in the shirt pocket camera, the excruciatingly > expensive Leica CM is the perfect choice. It is very quiet and is > smaller than it looks in the pictures. Controls are well thought out and > placed. The high quality P&S cameras are disappearing. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > http://www.400tx.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Richard > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:35 PM > To: lug@leica-users.org > Subject: [Leica] CL vs. CLE > > I wish I have jumped on Karen's CL offer :-) Anyway, I am looking for a > > > small M mount camera for backup and the CL/CLE look to be pretty good > > > choice. I have read all I could on Stephan Gandy's site and I still > haven't > quite decided which one to get yet. Any practical user level > suggestions? > > I'd imagine that this is a put a 40/2 or a 35/2 and leave it in the > shirt > pocket type of camera. > > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, > please > use richard at imagecraft.com) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information