Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] CL vs. CLE
From: datamaster at northcoastphotos.com (Gary Todoroff)
Date: Tue Apr 26 12:48:56 2005

Best "shirt pocket" camera I've found is the P&S Yashica T3 with its
wonderful 35mm Zeiss T* lens. It is an automatic camera, but that lens will
not disappoint you, and it really will fit in a shirt pocket. Plus you can
probably pick one up on eBay for under $100.
Gary Todoroff

I'd go with the Nikon 35Ti.  ;-)

Gene

If an M6/7 with a cron 35 is too much too haul around, get a Contax T3...

Steve

Jeffery Smith wrote:

> If you want a 40/2.4 put in the shirt pocket camera, the excruciatingly
> expensive Leica CM is the perfect choice. It is very quiet and is
> smaller than it looks in the pictures. Controls are well thought out and
> placed. The high quality P&S cameras are disappearing. > > Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:35 PM
> To: lug@leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] CL vs. CLE
> > I wish I have jumped on Karen's CL offer :-) Anyway, I am looking for a
> small M mount camera for backup and the CL/CLE look to be pretty good >
choice. I have read all I could on Stephan Gandy's site and I still
> haven't > quite decided which one to get yet. Any practical user level
> suggestions?
> > I'd imagine that this is a put a 40/2 or a 35/2 and leave it in the
> shirt > pocket type of camera.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.3 - Release Date: 4/25/2005


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)
In reply to: Message from grduprey at aol.com (grduprey@aol.com) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)