Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There's a lab here on town called theDarkroom which does wet and digital prints. There is a gallery display there with traditional and digital B&W prints. I cannot tell 20x24 prints apart with the digital and "wet" prints when they are hanged on a wall in a frame. These prints are from the 7600 and 9600 printers, coated and matte papers everything from Epson, Ilford, Agfa, Bergger and Luminous. Of course it will always come down to "IMO" on anything photography, been that way for centuries. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Feli" Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Epson printer > Not sure how this is possible. The reason why traditional fiber prints > look > the way they do is because the print is embedded in the actual paper. > With an inkjet print the image sits on top of the paper. Both reflect > and > scatter the light differently, thus looking different. > > > > This is without those piezo inks, using "off shelf inks". I've read > > Oriental or Seagull have FB > > style paper for inkjet printers now. Maybe that would be a great test > > to do. > > I would be curious to see a print on one of these papers. > > > feli /lug for more information