Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Epson printer
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Sat Feb 26 10:33:50 2005
References: <001001c51c2a$6539fb30$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>
 
Okee dokee. Back to the Zeiss vs. Leica war. Or let's go shoot some film.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "B. D. Colen" Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:Epson printer


> Sorry, Chris. And let me preface this by saying that I used a Peizo
> system for about six years, and I love the results. But I have yet to
> see any inkhjet prints, other than the 8.5x11s produced by the smaller
> HP printers, that look like wet prints. Look gorgeous? Yes. Look "real,"
> particularly to the uninitiated? Yes. Look like wet prints. No.
> Particularly from the 2200 - it just ain't so.
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re:Epson printer)