Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tri-X. I can find a reasonable substitute for anything other than it. T400CN is already gone, and I don't find BW400CN to be the same thing. But the former is already gone. On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:10:09 -0800, JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com> wrote: > > >On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:35:13 -0800, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> > >wrote: > > > What is it with all you guys on Tri X! > > > > > > You guys are shooting the IDEA of Tri x. > > > > > > I doubt there's a teensy weensy bit of real Tri X DNA left in this > > newest of > > > the new tri x's. > > > The box doesn't make me feel very nostalgic. > > > And packaging lets face it is everything. > > > > > > They should rename it Nine X. > > > > > > Nine lives like a cat X. > > > > > > Reincar nine x. > At 03:49 PM 2/23/2005, David Mason wrote: > > >I really don't claim to not be stupid... but I don't understand this > >part of your post at all. > > > > > >I really like Neopan 1600 and would be sad to see it go. > > > > > >Dave > > HUH? It's perfectly clear! Mark said Today's Tri-X is not the Tri-X we grew > up with. They did a makeover a year or so ago (new plant) and goofed on the > recipe. So we should call it anything but Tri-X. > > :-) > > JB > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >