Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:35:13 -0800, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> >wrote: > > What is it with all you guys on Tri X! > > > > You guys are shooting the IDEA of Tri x. > > > > I doubt there's a teensy weensy bit of real Tri X DNA left in this > newest of > > the new tri x's. > > The box doesn't make me feel very nostalgic. > > And packaging lets face it is everything. > > > > They should rename it Nine X. > > > > Nine lives like a cat X. > > > > Reincar nine x. At 03:49 PM 2/23/2005, David Mason wrote: >I really don't claim to not be stupid... but I don't understand this >part of your post at all. > > >I really like Neopan 1600 and would be sad to see it go. > > >Dave HUH? It's perfectly clear! Mark said Today's Tri-X is not the Tri-X we grew up with. They did a makeover a year or so ago (new plant) and goofed on the recipe. So we should call it anything but Tri-X. :-) JB