Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Frank, I'm not sure that your argument could be one of the important reasons why the serious photographers are using digital. IMHO digital is useful for professionals, in fact it gives a pretty good quality, enough for many professionals works, is more easy, more fast, less expensive, easy manipulating..., probably with all the principal advantages the professional could appreciate. But for us, or at least, for me that I don't need all these qualities or advantages, that neither I have a enormous budget taking pictures, for me is much more easy and better in quality the traditional film work. Once (6 months ago) I went to a very top lab for professionals, I have ordered to scan some slides, you can imagine that they have the better equipments, and I've never get the same quality into the scanned image compared with the slide, I have asked why, the answer was if I employ a lot of time working on the scanned image I can improve it. I think that my "exigencies" are because I'm only an amateur, for most of professional work the digital quality is enough quite good. I like see on a image the fine gradation and subtle tones that Leica lenses gives on a big screen. I've read the Erwin Putts book about Leica lenses, somewhere he said that the Japanese concept was more on the contrast that on the Leica concept, more on other criteria as said. Maybe my position, or my mentality follows more than others these classical principles, I'm probably very conservative....romantic...., I don't know... Saludos cordiales, Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de Frank Dernie Enviado el: martes, 08 de febrero de 2005 7:50 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Back to Lisboa, new pictures I do not agree. If film were still superior to digital no serious photographer would be using it yet - they did not at first. Frank On 8 Feb, 2005, at 01:49, Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Gene, > > Thank you, I should recognize that I don't have absolutely any > interest for > the digital photography, I ask me constantly why?, IMHO the digital > lovers, > (that I respect of course) they are intending every day demonstrate > that > digital quality is the same as traditional, IMHO I think that's no > true, and > if it was, why we need the digital if with the traditional we was > satisfied?, maybe this is the progress, or the technology for the > technology > himself, but with IMHO with a poor added value in quality. > > I'm sorry for my opinion > > Saludos cordiales, _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information