Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I do not agree. If film were still superior to digital no serious photographer would be using it yet - they did not at first. Frank On 8 Feb, 2005, at 01:49, Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Gene, > > Thank you, I should recognize that I don't have absolutely any > interest for > the digital photography, I ask me constantly why?, IMHO the digital > lovers, > (that I respect of course) they are intending every day demonstrate > that > digital quality is the same as traditional, IMHO I think that's no > true, and > if it was, why we need the digital if with the traditional we was > satisfied?, maybe this is the progress, or the technology for the > technology > himself, but with IMHO with a poor added value in quality. > > I'm sorry for my opinion > > Saludos cordiales,