Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Nathan, Thank you for your comments, but I think that probably is no difference between a image you see on a computer, but I modestly think that quality is quite different if you project it on a big screen. The advantages you mention are definitively the great arguments, but for me they don't justify the digital. Of course economy is very important too, but I've never expend a lot of money in film, of course digital allows you to take more pictures, but for my way of use I've never take more, or much more pictures that I wanted or needed... Maybe I'll change my opinion in the future..., if yes, you will know it very fast, sure! Un cordial saludo Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de Nathan Wajsman Enviado el: martes, 08 de febrero de 2005 5:47 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Back to Lisboa, new pictures Luis, The pictures are nice, I love Lisboa, although I agree with others that a bit of editing might be in order. But this has nothing to do with digital vs. analogue. The images could equally well have been produced with either method. I shoot digital now for its convenience, superior quality at high ISO ratings, the immediate feedback and the lower cost; I am not out to prove the superiority of one or the other medium, I just take pictures. Nathan Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Gene, > > Thank you, I should recognize that I don't have absolutely any interest for > the digital photography, I ask me constantly why?, IMHO the digital lovers, > (that I respect of course) they are intending every day demonstrate that > digital quality is the same as traditional, IMHO I think that's no true, and > if it was, why we need the digital if with the traditional we was > satisfied?, maybe this is the progress, or the technology for the technology > himself, but with IMHO with a poor added value in quality. > > I'm sorry for my opinion > > Saludos cordiales, > Luis > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=470088 -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography available at: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman Prints for sale at: http://www.photodeluge.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information