Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, The pictures are nice, I love Lisboa, although I agree with others that a bit of editing might be in order. But this has nothing to do with digital vs. analogue. The images could equally well have been produced with either method. I shoot digital now for its convenience, superior quality at high ISO ratings, the immediate feedback and the lower cost; I am not out to prove the superiority of one or the other medium, I just take pictures. Nathan Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Gene, > > Thank you, I should recognize that I don't have absolutely any interest for > the digital photography, I ask me constantly why?, IMHO the digital lovers, > (that I respect of course) they are intending every day demonstrate that > digital quality is the same as traditional, IMHO I think that's no true, > and > if it was, why we need the digital if with the traditional we was > satisfied?, maybe this is the progress, or the technology for the > technology > himself, but with IMHO with a poor added value in quality. > > I'm sorry for my opinion > > Saludos cordiales, > Luis > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=470088 -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography available at: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman Prints for sale at: http://www.photodeluge.com