Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: OT: A little history
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Tue Jan 25 15:21:38 2005
References: <20050125230316.88242.qmail@web50501.mail.yahoo.com> <43E0A3D38689FDAEFC82F82E@[192.168.1.107]>

I have to disagree,from what i was taught in university ,order of magnitude 
steps in computing are roughly 6 years apart.The improvements consumers can 
buy in that period are carefully fed in to the market to maximise profits.
best regards
simon jessurun
amsterdam
the netherlands


> Having spent the majority of my life working for technology manufacturing 
> companies, I can assure you that this is absolutely untrue.
>
> While there may be industries in which there is planned obsolescence, the 
> computer industry is not one of them.
>
> The issue in the computer industry is that the engineers keep coming up 
> with new stuff that is very much better than what existed a year ago. If 
> you don't sell it, then your competitors will. If you don't innovate, you 
> go out of business. Relentless innovation leaves a trail of obsolete 
> devices, but if you start feeling sorry for the people who have to buy new 
> ones, and slow down a little, they'll just buy from your competitors.
>
> In fact, quite the opposite is true. Development in the technology 
> industry is in general hindered by a desire to be compatible with the 
> past. If the hardware and software companies didn't worry about 
> compatibility with the past, they could probably innovate 20% faster than 
> they are doing now.
>
> No one is forcing you to buy newer faster better cameras and computers. As 
> many people have said here, a 2.1 megapixel camera still takes great 
> pictures. So why are camera companies racing to make and sell cameras with 
> more megapixels? Because people will buy them. People want them. This 
> isn't a conspiracy, it's just market demand at work.
>
>
>
>
>> I believe one of the basic premises of contemporary
>> technology development is the concept of "planned
>> obsolescence," with the deliberate goal of encouraging
>> consumers to buy new tools on a regular basis, in
>> lock-step with the constantly increasing profit motive
>> of the manufacturers.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss) ([Leica] RE: OT: A little history)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] RE: OT: A little history)
Reply from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] RE: OT: A little history)
In reply to: Message from lowiemanuel at yahoo.ca (Emanuel Lowi) ([Leica] RE: OT: A little history)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] RE: OT: A little history)