Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can understand why you would think I am advocating abandonment of the R system, but that would make no sense financially. Leica has a huge investment in the R system. the problem is how to get a return on that investment. 1) Leica R glass is probably the best SLR glass available overall. About 60% of the independent manuf SLR lens sales are Nikon AIS. to make profit on R glass, Leica needs to sell that glass in Nikon AIS mount 2) Leica is rumored to have a large quantity of unsold R9 bodies. Leica needs to turn that inventory into cash. The way to do that is to announce that R SLR bodies are discontinued. This would turn a slow seller into a hot seller as people go for the last German R body. 3) Staying with lenses in R mount and Nikon mount, Leica needs to license the R body mount, allowing other manuf to make R cameras. This is a fast, no cost way for Leica to offer their fans digital R bodies, while at the same time making a license fee off each body without investment. Imagine a Kodak 14MP or Sigma or the latest 12 MP Fujica digitals in Leica R mount. Of course those digital bodies would would also sell more a hell of a lot of Leica made R lenses. I believe these three plans would result in a big R system profit. Stephen Gandy Doug Herr wrote: > Exactly! When a manufacturer has a weak-performing product line the > choices > include abandonment (B.D. and Gandy)