Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Although Fuji digital SLR's produce excellent images. The build quality sucks if you are going to compare it to a Leica R8/R9. I cannot imagine Sigma being any better when it comes to build quality. And don't even start with a Kodak/Leica SLR. I picked up a Canon 20D last night, felt like a toy. Even the 10D was better in quality terms. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Gandy" Subject: [Leica] Future R Plan > I can understand why you would think I am advocating abandonment of the R system, > but that would make no sense financially. > > Leica has a huge investment in the R system. the problem is how to get a return > on that investment. > > 1) Leica R glass is probably the best SLR glass available overall. About 60% of > the independent manuf SLR lens sales are Nikon AIS. to make profit on R glass, > Leica needs to sell that glass in Nikon AIS mount > > 2) Leica is rumored to have a large quantity of unsold R9 bodies. Leica needs to > turn that inventory into cash. The way to do that is to announce that R SLR bodies > are discontinued. This would turn a slow seller into a hot seller as people go > for the last German R body. > > 3) Staying with lenses in R mount and Nikon mount, Leica needs to license the R > body mount, allowing other manuf to make R cameras. This is a fast, no cost way > for Leica to offer their fans digital R bodies, while at the same time making a > license fee off each body without investment. Imagine a Kodak 14MP or Sigma or > the latest 12 MP Fujica digitals in Leica R mount. Of course those digital bodies > would would also sell more a hell of a lot of Leica made R lenses. > > I believe these three plans would result in a big R system profit. > > Stephen Gandy