Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: opinions on M7 vs. MP
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 21:57:47 -0400
References: <3B2DF5E7-C61D-11D7-83D1-003065F2FE36@xsmail.com>

Mitch Alland wrote:
>> Head says M7....heart says (with a loud insistend beat) MP.
> 
> 
> I looked at a black MP in a store: first, the retrograde rewind knob is 
> absurd; second, the black lacquer looks pretty but its glossiness 
> attracts much more attention to the camera than the black chrome of the 
> M6 which defeats the purpose of the camera being black in the first 
> place; also the lacquer shows fingerprints encouraging frequent cleaning 
> with a cloth -- perfect for fondlers.
> 
> As for the M7, I would be attracted to only if it had shutter speeds 
> faster than 1/1000th.
> 
> So, I'll stick with my two M6s although when I get to the States at the 
> end of the month I'm having Sherry Krauter do a CLA on my Wetzlar M6 
> purchased in 1988 because it has (occasionally) a light leak -- a 
> problem that apparently Sherry has seen on many M6s. My Solms M6 does 
> not have this problem. It amazes me that Leica should have been 
> producing camera bodies that are subject to light leaks!

What kind of light leak are you talking about? I've certainly never 
heard of this being a general issue.

Rolfe

- -- 
Rolfe Tessem      |     Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
rolfe@ldp.com     |     96 Morton Street
(212) 463-0029    |     New York, Ny 10014

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Mitch Alland <malland@xsmail.com> ([Leica] Re: opinions on M7 vs. MP)