Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] If only one more R lens,
From: "Margaret Jeffcoat" <margaret01@excelonline.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:39:18 -0500
References: <001c01c175f3$9f0b38a0$141ff4d8@0017899054>

Look for a clean 90 f2(2 or 3 cam-they don't make this lens anymore-but it
is on of the all time greats) and either a 24 2.8 or a 19 2.8 ( I have the
21 f4-great lens).
Cheers Wilber
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Fuller <merryandbo@earthlink.net>
To: leica <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 3:56 PM
Subject: [Leica] If only one more R lens,


> I recently became the owner of a R3 with the standard 50mm lens. I'm
> practicing with it (12-15 rolls a month), but am now interested in a
> different lens. About 30% of my shots are around or in the house, or at
> a motorcycle rally, with a range of approx.10 feet. The other 70 % are
> shot in nature, with about half of that 70 % being landscapes (some at
> considerable distance) and the other half being wildlife (maybe flowers
> up close, maybe a hawk a hundred yards away). If  I could only get one
> more lens, what should it be? And if I could get two more lenses, what
> would they be (same as the second plus another or two completely
> different ones)? And what if I could get three?!? My total budget is
> probably around $4,000, so one of those lens at $8-10,000 is out of the
> question. Thanks for any help.
>
> Bo Fuller
> Southern Calif
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Larry Fuller" <merryandbo@earthlink.net> ([Leica] If only one more R lens,)