Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Scala
From: ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 17:15:29 +0800
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010401140700.00a5c860@206.34.200.40> <5.0.1.4.0.20010402113513.00a647a0@206.34.200.40> <006e01c0bb97$e9074f00$ce757bd5@btopenworld.com> <00ab01c0bbdc$8040bf20$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com> <3AC92941.3BED7194@netvigator.com> <3ACBF5D3.8DAC0F5A@webshuttle.ch> <3ACC0F66.E062BF47@netvigator.com>

I meant to type "30 rolls per month"!

ray tai wrote:

> Nathan,
>
> I am in Hong Kong and Scala has to be special ordered from the Agfa agent, and for
> processing sent to Japan.  Turn around time takes about two weeks and around $12/roll
> excluding the film and shipping.  A friend of mine loves Scala and shoots nothing
> else; however he doesn't shoot much and let the exposed film sit in his refrigerator
> until he has accumulated enough to spread out the shipping charge for Japan
> processing.  While I find this to be pure hassle this is not the reason why I am
> sticking to XP2 and 400CN.  By the way processing K64 is more of a hassle and I like
> K64 more than Provia!
>
> First of all I really like Scala.  On the lightbox it has the glow not unlike a
> sparkling wet b&w print, and the tones are alot like TX.  However I am currently
> in-between technologies: having moved here from the States I have given up access to
> a darkroom and now don't even do my own film processing due to the chemicals and
> children thing; and I haven't completely devoted myself to a digital darkroom since I
> only shoot around 30 rolls per week with a mix of color prints, slides and XP2.
> These days what I want is a digital file with as much information on it as possible
> to take advantage of output technologies available today and tomorrow; but at the
> same time I want to retain the analog source, i.e., negative, on file for traditional
> printing if the chance ever comes along again.   I just feel the new XP2 satisfies my
> current requirements.  I get prints from it in one hour and I scan the shots I like,
> do what I need to do on the Mac and save it for future use.
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
> > Ray,
> >
> > Scala can give you the best of both worlds: a slide to project and something to
> > print from. Depending on where you live, Scala processing need not be any more
> > difficult than normal E6. When I lived in Brussels, I took my Scala to a lab that
> > did same-day service; here in Zurich I just drop it off at a photo lab near my
> > office and get the slides the following day at a price that is 2 CHF (about $1.30)
> > higher than for E6.
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> > ray tai wrote:
> >
> > > What is the advantage of shooting Scala?  Film and processing are not widely
> > > available and expensive.  I have used it a few times and believe CN400 scans
> > > better.  You can't print Scala in a tradition B&W darkroom and color chemistry
> > > is not the ideal choice for B&W due to the color cast.  What is the point of
> > > shooting Scala unless your primary purpose is for projection?  Please educate
> > > me!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ray
> >
> > --
> > Nathan Wajsman
> > Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

In reply to: Message from "Michael E. Bérubé" <MEB@goodphotos.com> ([Leica] Week 13: SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from "Michael E. Bérubé" <MEB@goodphotos.com> ([Leica] Week 13: SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> ([Leica] Re: [Leica] Week 13: SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> ([Leica] SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Scala)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Scala)
Message from ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Scala)