Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people auto-unsubscribed
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:46:16 -0600
References: <266C7104DC716A311EE66EE6@dhcp-71.sql1.isc.org><3EEB259A48FBE34F98657A8C76CF51B2F9C977@mbx027-w1-ca-1.exch027.domain.local><4F6CDEF80CCB4C46B244D4A8F0B987CC@billHP><213EC333731B448DA9CE68FFFACB113F@jimnichols> <2B2CBA59764A4D26877D346384AC705B@billHP>

I guess not.  All of those thousands of lawyers have to make a living.  But 
not something I condone.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs,some people 
auto-unsubscribed


> Jim, Jim!!
>
> This is America. No case is too weak for litigation!
>
> Bill Pearce
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Jim Nichols
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:19 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs,some people 
> auto-unsubscribed
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> It is very difficult for the user to determine where the blocking is being
> done.  Since I know who furnishes spam blocking for my local ISP, I 
> suspect
> that they are the culprits, but suspecting and knowing are two different
> things.  Even the support people at my local ISP have difficulty with 
> this.
> I furnished them a printout of the full header on a typical message from 
> the
> LUG to me, and they worked with support folks further up the line.  As of
> this morning, they had no feedback, but the problem disappeared yesterday
> afternoon.
>
> Now I am trying to find out whether the correction resulted from my emails
> to Carrierzone, or from the efforts of my ISP.  They may never admit there
> was a problem.
>
> All told, a pretty weak case for litigation.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs,some people
> auto-unsubscribed
>
>
>> Boys, this is America! Litigation is always in order!
>>
>> Bill Pearce
>>
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: Bryan Willman
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:43 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people 
>> auto-unsubscribed
>>
>> I wonder if such behavoir (by van Riel) constitutes defamation, and if 
>> litigation (or the threat thereof) might be of use.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+bryanwi=bryanwi.com at leica-users.org 
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+bryanwi=bryanwi.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Brian Reid
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 4:07 PM
>> To: lug at leica-users.org
>> Subject: [Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people 
>> auto-unsubscribed
>>
>> A bunch of LUG subscribers have been auto-unsubscribed because of a lazy
>> ideologue in Merrimack New Hampshire named Rik van Riel. Rik believes 
>> that he
>> has the only solution to the spam detection problem, and unfortunately a 
>> few
>> ISPs believe him.  Responsible ISPs use dozens upon dozens of factors to
>> classify something as spam. Since van Riel doesn't charge for his 
>> spam-finding
>> service, cheapo ISPs will sometimes use it and only it. When van Riel's 
>> spam
>> detectors make a mistake (which he, of course, believes is not possible) 
>> then
>> mail stops getting delivered to the customers of the ISPs that depend on 
>> his
>> free service.
>>
>> If you are one of the people whose LUG subscription went away, you can 
>> think
>> bad thoughts about Rik van Riel. Ideologues like him rarely change their
>> position as a result of argument from other people, so there is no point
>> trying to yell at him or reason with him. In a certain sense the real 
>> villains
>> are the owners of the ISPs that are too cheap to buy real commercial
>> spam-blocking service, which requires human participation and is 
>> therefore not
>> free.
>>
>> The only viable long-term solution to false-positive spam nightmares is 
>> to
>> find a responsible ISP. Cheapo ISPs are going to use cheapo spam-control
>> companies, who invariably lock onto free services run by ideologues.
>>
>> If you are one of the victims, you of course aren't getting this email, 
>> but
>> you might see it on the website or you might get a copy forwarded from a
>> friend.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people auto-unsubscribed)
Message from bryanwi at bryanwi.com (Bryan Willman) ([Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people auto-unsubscribed)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people auto-unsubscribed)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people auto-unsubscribed)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] LUG mail being blocked by bad ISPs, some people auto-unsubscribed)