Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:29 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > Often the "in my experience, with my samples?" > is left implied along with the "YMMV" > > We each report on our unique anecdotal experience > with our own examples of hardware, software and workflow. > Individual samples do vary (as the subject of this thread clearly states). > > For some of us one set of tools works a bit better than another set; > while for others it may be the opposite. > Many, like Jim, seem to have extensive personal experience > with very large cross sections of many different systems. > > Bottom line: all that matters > is that we're happy with our tool choices and results. > > For some that means L for others O, N, C, S or P > > I suspect that each system has some superior aspect over others; > yet no one system has achieved the ultimate, "superior in all conceivable > aspects" rating. and I suspect it will never happen, don't you George...? after all, like any tool, some are designed to hammer nails, others to turn screws, yet others to unstuff toilets. Steve... > > Y M M V ;~) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Richard Man wrote: > >> What I don't understand is why can't I make a statement that "for my >> purpose, my E-3 pics are comparable to my M8 pics" without people >> telling me that the Leica must be superior :-)? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information