[Leica] Problem with new to me M8

[richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)]

The E-3 processing engine is quite a bit better than the other 4/3 and
micro 4/3 cameras. It is after all, their pro/semi-pro camera.

What I don't understand is why can't I make a statement that "for my
purpose, my E-3 pics are comparable to my M8 pics" without people
telling me that the Leica must be superior :-)?

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com> 
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I don't have an E-3, but I have a couple of m4/3 cameras, and while they
> definitely produce images that I'm generally quite happy with, they fall
> behind the M8 images in a number of ways. Poor as the M8 is at high ISO,
> it's better than the G1, GF1 or EP1. The M8 files are also more forgiving
> both of over and underexposure; they just have more dynamic range. And, 
> they
> hold somewhat more detail in spite of being 10Mb vs. 12Mb.
>




-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963