Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Often the "in my experience, with my samples?" is left implied along with the "YMMV" We each report on our unique anecdotal experience with our own examples of hardware, software and workflow. Individual samples do vary (as the subject of this thread clearly states). For some of us one set of tools works a bit better than another set; while for others it may be the opposite. Many, like Jim, seem to have extensive personal experience with very large cross sections of many different systems. Bottom line: all that matters is that we're happy with our tool choices and results. For some that means L for others O, N, C, S or P I suspect that each system has some superior aspect over others; yet no one system has achieved the ultimate, "superior in all conceivable aspects" rating. Y M M V ;~) Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Richard Man wrote: > What I don't understand is why can't I make a statement that "for my > purpose, my E-3 pics are comparable to my M8 pics" without people > telling me that the Leica must be superior :-)?