Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Are we no longer wanted?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:15:23 -0700
References: <4A3D60AB.6020607@gmx.de> <3cad89990906201939s2db48839uc107b2e31a40a5f5@mail.gmail.com> <36172e5a0906202028h6e2ce23bybd3fc25e1ed2a8d2@mail.gmail.com> <3cad89990906202157h1d77be61oe54741b935f4c4c9@mail.gmail.com> <36172e5a0906202232m10836d39p534aa0e533459832@mail.gmail.com>

On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:32 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Jayanand I feel defensive about Leica and the M8 because I am  
> enthusiastic
> about both and frequently see your posts and approach to both as  
> negative.
> I can never understand that on a Leica list.


and many were here and leica enthusiasts long before you Geoff...

(a fact that appears to have escaped you...)

somehow interesting and mildly amusing,


Steve




> Sorry, I just don't get it.
> Shooting and socialising with more than a hundred Leica enthusiasts  
> over a
> couple of days in Germany I saw a lot of keen photographers enjoying  
> their
> equipment.  No investment bankers although there was a least one  
> dentist ;-)
> I met a number of Leica staff from division heads and down and they  
> were
> without exception extraordinarily helpful and friendly. Looking at  
> their
> operation, people and facilities up close you can appreciate more  
> just why
> the lenses cost so much, for example. As you know I think they are  
> worth
> it. I want them to be around into the future too. I listened to Stefan
> Daniel provide much candid insight about the state of business for  
> Leica,
> some of which I shared here. Leica needs the support of users.
> When you are as enthusiastic and committed as I am sometimes the  
> constant
> criticism or armchair CEO advice on the web forums gets frustrating.
>
> Never mind I'll say no more and we'll continue to continue to have  
> polar
> opposite but amicable views on Leica and Adobe and Nikon and no  
> doubt much
> else besides ;-)





> .
> 2009/6/21 Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>
>
>> Geoff,
>> It is not some, but most of the sales have gone to folks who would  
>> use an
>> M8
>> as a fashion accessory. The real users buy most of their Leica kit  
>> used,
>> which is of no use to Leica, the company. The M8 in its early days  
>> was an
>> exception, but recently most of the messages on this list on this  
>> subject
>> are about buying it used, or about alternatives from Panasonic and  
>> Olympus.
>> The fact is that Leica is marketing into a certain segment of  
>> society which
>> is in difficulty now because of the economic crisis, so the S2  
>> targeted at
>> professionals may be a good idea after all. Much better than  
>> bringing out a
>> R10 which will sell in miniscule numbers. At least the numbers that  
>> the S2
>> will sell at would bring in much larger margins. Whatever we may  
>> think,
>> volumes do count! The D5000 is far more important than the D3x for  
>> Nikon
>> from a company health and profitability point of view. I also think  
>> that
>> Leica have screwed up big time by not bringing in a less expensive M
>> camera,
>> maybe with an EVF, and not following Zeiss' example of offering their
>> legendary lenses in Nikon/Canon/M42 mounts. If the M is not central  
>> to
>> their
>> future, as it seems right now, they might as well maximise the  
>> revenue from
>> their main intellectual property, i.e. the lens designs for the M  
>> and R
>> lines. All in all, Leica seems to be a confused company right now,  
>> and not
>> a
>> very well managed one at that. Pity.
>>
>> I do not know why calling an item a rich man's plaything has such  
>> negative
>> connotations. It certainly does not reflect on the quality of the  
>> item, or
>> the user. I have expensive watches, use only bespoke clothing, etc.  
>> etc.
>> which are all extravagances, and I am unapologetic about it. I  
>> bought a
>> Nikkor 200-400 lens, which for an amateur is an extravagance, too.  
>> I don't
>> drive expensive cars because that is not my scene, and I get no  
>> pleasure
>> from it.   Why don't you just enjoy the M8 instead of getting  
>> defensive
>> about it every time? Accept it in your mind that it is your  
>> indulgence, and
>> that is it!
>>
>> I am debating between the M8 and G1 because, for me, it would be  
>> very much
>> a
>> secondary system to my Nikon kit and spending a load of cash into a  
>> body
>> that will not be used very much seems a waste - better buy a D700  
>> instead.
>> I
>> was all prepared to buy a M9 when it came out, with all issues  
>> sorted out
>> (like the necessity of using an IR filter, which in hot, humid, dusty
>> climates like ours is a PITA), but now it looks as if it might not  
>> come for
>> quite some time, if at all. Hence the quandary.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Geoff Hopkinson  
>> <hopsternew at gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Some folks with lots of spare funds might buy Leica because it is  
>>> stylish
>>> or
>>> elegant or higher status or whatever. Good for them. It helps  
>>> Leica which
>>> helps other users too. Who knows, some of your investment bankers  
>>> may
>> shoot
>>> with their new cameras and get addicted.
>>> Keen enthusiasts will find the money or build their outfits as  
>>> they can
>> and
>>> choose Leica for the reasons we choose Leica.
>>> Point of interest. The Summilux 50 ASPH. outsells the much cheaper  
>>> and
>>> still by all accounts excellent Summarit 50  by 2:1
>>> Why would that be?
>>>
>>> 2009/6/21 Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Douglas,
>>>> This has been evident for years now. They have been targeting rich
>>>> investment bankers and their ilk, not you and me. It became quite
>> obvious
>>>> with the M8 advertising campaign, which was far more prominent in  
>>>> the
>>>> GQ/Esquire type magazines rather than hardcore photography  
>>>> magazines.
>> It
>>>> was
>>>> also heavily featured in the "fashion tech" pages (alongside the
>>> Ipod,etc)
>>>> of those magazines. But if truth be told, the bankers would buy  
>>>> new,
>> and
>>> we
>>>> would buy second hand...
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Jayanand
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de 
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was looking up things Leica on the Web recently and noticed the
>>> number
>>>> of
>>>>> hits that turn up for Leica on "lifestyle" pages.
>>>>>
>>>>> It didn't seem to work after their flutter with Hermes, but now  
>>>>> they
>>> seem
>>>>> to have got their products prominently "placed", or even  
>>>>> "positioned"
>>> (in
>>>>> the words of the world of marketing)
>>>>>
>>>>> No more mention of precision optics and superb engineering -  
>>>>> it's all
>>>>> turned into up-market hype about the special finish, how they look
>> and
>>> if
>>>>> they have a perfectly matching bag... everything in black, white,
>> olive
>>>>> green, titanium and silver seems to be the name of the game.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The opening of the new Leica Shop in Moscow's uppest-market
>> residential
>>>> and
>>>>> shopping quarter at the end of May seems to be following the same
>>> trend.
>>>> I
>>>>> wouldn't be surprised to find cameras in gold and royal blue  
>>>>> with a
>>>> double
>>>>> eagle or in Faberge enamel soon, packed in a matching Faberge  
>>>>> easter
>>> egg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then Ferrari red, Bugatti blue, Mercedes silver and, and,
>> and.........
>>>>>
>>>>> The higher prices are obviously already a unique and exclusive
>> selling
>>>>> point for people who want to be seen with a Leica as a lifestyle
>>>> accessory.
>>>>>
>>>>> The M8 Safari is almost sold out, the White Edition has gone
>>> completely,
>>>> a
>>>>> D-Lux 4 Titan and a D-Lux 4 Safari are selling well.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is all very good for Leica, but I think it bodes ill for the
>>> former
>>>>> target group to which we all most probably belong.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Douglas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers
>>> Geoff
>>> 'Life's not B&W, except at both ends'
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> 'Life's not B&W, except at both ends'
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
In reply to: Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are we no longer wanted?)