Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Douglas:? What John says is correct, but there's a loophole.? You can still get a perpetual license for Capture One. It costs more than you will like. However, if you buy a perpetual license, you can use that version for as long as you want, providing your hardware and OS will support it. Are you are the type who likes to get regular fixes and enhancements? Are you lured by the prospect of ever-smarter so-called AI tools for removing Comrade Outov Favoroff from photos of last year's May Day parade? Then going the Adobe subscription route makes more sense. But it you like Capture One and are OK with the version you have, a perpetual license can also make sense. Just upgrade every 3-5 years rather than every time they dangle a shiny new thing, which may not always be so shiny once you dig into it. That's what I'm doing. I've used Capture One since it came free with my M8. I stayed with it because it did what I needed, and it kept me out of Adobe's "pay forever" model. Then recently, Capture One went to that same model. Many users? regarded this as a blatant betrayal (as did I) but hey, that's business. I fooled with both Darktable and Raw Therapee (open source alternatives), and decided it made more sense to stick with my old, perpetually licensed Capture One version 20. I think it's about five years old now.? I've invested a lot of time and knowledge in Capture One that I'd rather not throw away, even if their business practices offend me. If the next version has a real improvement over v. 20, I'll probably upgrade and use that for the next few years. I'd rather do that than have to learn a less convenient and capable open source program. Or be assimilated by the Borg, I mean Adobe, and still have to relearn everything anyway. OTOH, if you're already familiar with Adobe's tools and way of doing things, and are comfortable with them, then maybe just subscribing to Adobe makes sense. I did a sobering exercise recently, involving how much each software package would cost over my likely remaining lifetime. For those of us "of a certain age," the differences are not so great no matter what we do. So it makes sense to think about the value of your experience, skill and affinity with a particular product. One Fuji-specific wrinkle is that Capture One has always handled Fuji files better than Adobe. Do some Googling to see how much that might matter to you. Hope this helps! --Peter > Capture One has gone to the same pricing model (albeit more expensive) as > Adobe AFAIK. > > john > > ?On 25/07/2024, 01:15, "LUG on behalf of Douglas Barry" > <lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.uk at leica-users.org on behalf of imra at > iol.ie> wrote: > > > Incidentally, it comes with a free trial > of Capture One which I know little about. I use Lightroom 6 and PSE 15 > which won?t work with the new Fuji raw files. Of course, I could go > Adobe monthly, but I?d be interested in hearing what people have to > say > about the Capture One directional option. Has any one switched to it? > > > Opinions gratefully received. > > Douglas >