Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/08/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Film and Digital
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 22:18:50 -0500
References: <CAH1UNJ2m-SQK5D5bXejUGRwBrMXXqUYpoDsMuUenOJZVC8Y7Kg@mail.gmail.com>

That was an interesting article.  I believe the author has a decidedly pro
film belief.  We have many people on this list that are decidedly pro film
for their own unique reasons.

One of the reasons I have switched to digital is the process makes my life
easier.   As owners of the Q2 can attest,  high pixel count sensors can
sustain amazing crops with outstanding results.   I just came back from a
lot of hiking in the Pacific NW.  I am not 18 anymore so I embarked with
one high pixel count camera and a 35mm lens that will focus to 1/2 life
size.  With the new features in PS I had a light portable 35-200ish range
with 4000 exposures that didn't keep me off interesting trails.

In film days 4 lenses and 30-70 rolls of film and constraints of x
exposures left is this Vista interesting enough...

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021, 9:40 PM Jayanand Govindaraj via LUG <
lug at leica-users.org> wrote:

> A nice column:
>
> https://www.blurb.com/blog/film-digital-photography/
>
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Film and Digital)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Film and Digital)